[wsf-c-dev] Axis2/C performance resullts with fine tuned Apache httpd
Rajika Kumarasiri
rajika at wso2.com
Tue Jul 8 01:19:10 PDT 2008
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 10:53 +0530, Rajika Kumarasiri wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 10:47 +0530, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
> > Rajika Kumarasiri wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 08:10 +0530, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
> > >
> > >> What is the fastest Web server around? I suppose it is not httpd.
> > >>
> > > Nope, Yaws ?
> > > http://yaws.hyber.org/
> > >
> > > Apache vs. Yaws,
> > > http://www.sics.se/~joe/apachevsyaws.html
> > >
> > > BTW, yaws was written in Erlang.
> > >
> >
> > BTW, if that is the case, then that does not work for us, does it? Can
> > we write an extension?
> I don't know weather they have a native C API, will update soon.
yes, Erlang doesn't supports a native C API, but this one has get done
PHP5 working with yaws.
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=88605.79762.qm%
40web62003.mail.re1.yahoo.com&forum_name=erlyaws-list
-Rajika
>
> -Rajika
> >
> > Samisa...
> >
> > > -Rajika
> > >
> > >> What if we write an Axis2/C module for that fastest Web server?
> > >>
> > >> Samisa...
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Rajika Kumarasiri wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Rajika Kumarasiri wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> What were the kernel tuning that were done?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Also, only 16,000 tps with httpd for pure html? Given the
> > >>>>>>> processing power of our test environment, this should not it be
> > >>>>>>> far better than this?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/misc/perf-tuning.html
> > >>>>>> http://www.devside.net/articles/apache-performance-tuning
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> Well, I followed this and the guidance available here.
> > >>>>> http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/Apachecon-EU2005/scaling-apache-handout.pdf
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> There are some additional info in the above links. Like removing
> > >>>> unused modules.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> My gut feel is that, normal httpd could perform way beyond 16k TPS. I
> > >>>> could be wrong. But we need to research this.
> > >>>>
> > >>> I 'll further look into this.
> > >>>
> > >>> -Rajika
> > >>>
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>> Samisa...
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Any way, thanks for the information.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -Rajika
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>> Samisa...
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>> Samisa...
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Rajika Kumarasiri wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> hello every body,
> > >>>>>>>> I did a performance test for Axis2/C using httpd module,
> > >>>>>>>> mod_axis2. The
> > >>>>>>>> test was carried out after fine tuning(for virtual memory, file
> > >>>>>>>> system,
> > >>>>>>>> network etc..) the Apache web server.
> > >>>>>>>> Before fine tuning Apache, it was able to serve around 13,000
> > >>>>>>>> requests
> > >>>>>>>> per second (I checked this for static content of size 44 bytes,
> > >>>>>>>> using
> > >>>>>>>> index.html as a sample) and after the tuning it was able to serve
> > >>>>>>>> around
> > >>>>>>>> 16,000 requests per second.
> > >>>>>>>> The test was done in the same manner as the previous one using the
> > >>>>>>>> Guththila as the parser under same hardware resources.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Results are as follows.(in requests per second)
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> small data set (with 1 element)
> > >>>>>>>> ==============
> > >>>>>>>> echoVoid(269 bytes) - 12293
> > >>>>>>>> echoDoubles(298 bytes) - 11666
> > >>>>>>>> echoInts(290 bytes) - 12095
> > >>>>>>>> echoStrings(297 bytes) - 12,033
> > >>>>>>>> echoSimpleEvents(418 bytes) - 11,440
> > >>>>>>>> echoMeshInterfaceObjects(379 bytes) - 11861
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> large data set (with 100 elements) ==============
> > >>>>>>>> echoDoubles(2.9 KB) - 5676
> > >>>>>>>> echoInts(2.7 KB) - 6816.83
> > >>>>>>>> echoStrings(2.8 KB) - 6984.28
> > >>>>>>>> echoSimpleEvents(15 KB) - 1756.59
> > >>>>>>>> echoMeshInterfaceObjects(9.6 KB) - 2204.84
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Conclusion:
> > >>>>>>>> According to the results there is around 700- 1500 requests per
> > >>>>>>>> seconds
> > >>>>>>>> improvement for small data and for large data the amounts remain the
> > >>>>>>>> same as the previous.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> -Rajika
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>>>>> Wsf-c-dev mailing list
> > >>>>>>>> Wsf-c-dev at wso2.org
> > >>>>>>>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wsf-c-dev
> > >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
> > >>>>>>>> Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.0.0/1489 -
> > >>>>>>>> Release Date: 6/7/2008 11:17 AM
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
> > >>>>>>> Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.0.0/1489 -
> > >>>>>>> Release Date: 6/7/2008 11:17 AM
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>> Wsf-c-dev mailing list
> > >>>>> Wsf-c-dev at wso2.org
> > >>>>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wsf-c-dev
> > >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
> > >>>>> Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.0.0/1489 -
> > >>>>> Release Date: 6/7/2008 11:17 AM
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Wsf-c-dev mailing list
> > >>> Wsf-c-dev at wso2.org
> > >>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wsf-c-dev
> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> No virus found in this incoming message.
> > >>> Checked by AVG.
> > >>> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.0.0/1489 - Release Date: 6/7/2008 11:17 AM
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wsf-c-dev mailing list
> > > Wsf-c-dev at wso2.org
> > > http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wsf-c-dev
> > >
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> > > Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.4.6/1538 - Release Date: 7/7/2008 7:40 AM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wsf-c-dev mailing list
> Wsf-c-dev at wso2.org
> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wsf-c-dev
More information about the Wsf-c-dev
mailing list