[wsf-c-dev] [C++] Question on data types

[Senaka Fernando]

Yes, that is a good choice, but don't we miss out in defining boolean
types using integers?

Because C++ defines bool, we instead can use a subset of types defined
in axis, and use the new additions from C++

BTW, this only affects the interaction through the API. The internal
core will remain the same as C.

Therefore the C++ developers will feel more comfortable dealing with
types derived from bool, when it is a true-false scenario instead of the
AXIS implementation

What do you say?

On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 16:27 +0530, Damitha Kumarage wrote:
> Senaka Fernando wrote:
> 
> >Is it better to proceed with the addition of C++ primitive types
> >sparingly, or only with types defined in AXUTIL_..? (for instance, the
> >bool type can be re-defined or the existing definition in
> >AXUTIL_UTILS_DEFINES.h can be used which is derived from int)
> >
> >Which would be better and why?
> >  
> >
> Since you are going to write a set of C++ wrapper functions over C I 
> think it is better to adhere to existing typing instead of doing type 
> mapping between C++ and C.
> Damitha
> 
> >Regards,
> >
> >Senaka
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Wsf-c-dev mailing list
> >Wsf-c-dev at wso2.org
> >http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wsf-c-dev
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wsf-c-dev mailing list
> Wsf-c-dev at wso2.org
> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wsf-c-dev