[wsf-c-dev] [Fwd: Re: [News] [ANN] Initial release of WSF/Perl]
Samisa Abeysinghe
samisa at wso2.com
Mon Oct 1 22:07:34 PDT 2007
Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [News] [ANN] Initial release of WSF/Perl
> Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 11:04:23 +0530
> From: Chintana Wilamuna <chintana at wso2.com>
> Organization: WSO2 Inc.
> To: Samisa Abeysinghe <samisa at wso2.com>
> CC: news at lists.wso2.com
> References: <20071002011414.70c35d83 at localhost>
> <4701B8E1.7070609 at wso2.com>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:20:01 +0600, Samisa Abeysinghe <samisa at wso2.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Why have we hosted this on CPAN? Should we not have the artifacts on
>> wso2.org?
>
> wso2.org also have the artifacts, but the Perl way of distributing
> modules is through CPAN.
What are the licensing implications?
Also, How are the users supposed to get WSF/C which is a hard dependency?
For PHP, we have pecl. We would integrate pecl at some point in time but
the main project is in wso2.org.
>> Also, whatever docs we have should be on the perl page of wso2/wsf. I
>> do not see any docs linked form there.
>
> The way of distributing documentation with Perl modules is that it's
> written in the module itself as POD (plain old documentation). This
> is visible through the perldoc <module_name> command once the module is
> installed.
>
> And this is extracted and put in a nice HTML format when someone
> uploads a Perl module to CPAN. http://tinyurl.com/2at7d4
CPAN way is fine, but I believe we still have to have some docs
somewhere on the wso2.org. As an example the user guide and the API doc
has to be there hosted, or at least linked form WSO2 site I hope.
Samisa...
>
> Bye,
>
> -Chintana
>
--
Samisa Abeysinghe : WSO2 WSF/PHP
"http://wso2.org/projects/wsf/php?WSO2 Web Services Framework%2FPHP - Open source PHP extention for providing and consuming Web services in PHP"
More information about the Wsf-c-dev
mailing list