[wsf-c-dev] [wsf-php] RM API

[Damitha Kumarage]

>> Idea was to support  one way messaging with RM 1.0.
>
> Why not support that with RM 1.1 as well? What is the advantage of 
> using 1.0 to support oneway.
> It sounds odd to say "we support one way with RM 1.0 and two way with 
> RM 1.1". Comparatively, it is better to say that we support RM 1.1.
>
>
+1 until we support two way in php(if ever)

>>> "offer" does not indicate that is it talking about  "response 
>>> sequence", shall we use "response_sequence" instead?
>>
>> Offer is the word used in the specification, So I selected that.
>
> But that is too generic. Most PHP users would never even have a look 
> at the speck I suppose. So it better be a meaningful name here :)

I think the better nameing would be sequence_offer or offer_sequence.

Damitha