axis-c-dev (was Re: [wsf-c-dev] Use of C++)

[Dinesh Premalal]

Hi,

James Clark <james at wso2.com> writes:

>
> If we do decide to stick to C for the shared library, we should provide
> a C++ veneer for it.  The veneer would consist purely of header files
> (nothing in a shared library) providing a thin C++ layer on top of the
> shared library, which made it more pleasant and natural to use from C++.
>
> So what's the conclusion? I think there are good arguments for and
> against C++.  I have a view, but I would like to hear other people's
> opinions first.
I doubt whether this is the right list to discuss this. I think we are
discussing about future of Axis2/C therefore better to use axis-c-dev.
Then we might get good arguments. I'm sure very smart community out
there (at least they must be smarter than me :) ). 

Frankly, I have a very guilty feeling about , we decide things and let
community know about the things. I must agree that it's difficult to
come to conclusion on a mailing list. And it slow down the
process. At least we could discuss important factors like this in the
mail-ling list.

I'm very sorry about always talking against :( and if this mail sounds
rude. 

thanks,
Dinesh

ps: apologies for the late. I had a second thought about this mail :)

-- 
Dinesh Premalal
dinesh at wso2.com
WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/
GPG Key ID : A255955C
GPG Key Finger Print : C481 E5D4 C27E DC34 9257  0229 4F44 266E A255 955C