[wsas-java-dev] Re: [esb-java-dev] Product Names

[Sanjiva Weerawarana]

Afkham Azeez wrote:
> James Clark wrote:
>> I just think it's strange including the implementation language in
>> products that aren't libraries or toolkits.  It would be a bit like
>> Microsoft calling Office "Microsoft Office for C++".
>>
>> James
> 
> Initially, the "for Java" part was used to communicate to the user that
> WSAS is used for hosting Java Web services, but this isn't true anymore.
> WSAS can now host Javascript services, data services, and with the new
> pluggable deployer architecture, any type of service conceivable (at
> least in theory), so the "for Java" part looks inappropriate.
> 
> If we are going to drop the "for Java" portion, I'm totally +1 for it.

+1 from me too. So how about:

WSAS
ESB
WSF/Java etc.

When we do a C impl of ESB, we'll figure out what to call it .. maybe 
"ESB, C Edition".

Sanjiva.
-- 
Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/
email: sanjiva at wso2.com; cell: +94 77 787 6880; fax: +1 509 691 2000

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform."