[wsas-java-dev] Re: [esb-java-dev] Product Names

[Afkham Azeez]

James Clark wrote:
> I don't think "for Java" is good either.  Do any of the well-known Java
> application servers have "for Java" in their names?  "Application
> server" already strongly implies Java.  When we do something in C, I
> don't think it will be just a C equivalent for WSAS or ESB. I expect it
> will have its own distinct set of capabilities.  I think it would be
> better to call it the products just "WSAS" or "ESB".
> 
> I just think it's strange including the implementation language in
> products that aren't libraries or toolkits.  It would be a bit like
> Microsoft calling Office "Microsoft Office for C++".
> 
> James

Yes, "for Java" sounds very strange and non of the application servers
use this. At least with, WSAS, the "Application Server" part strongly
implies Java.


-- 
Afkham Azeez
GPG Fingerprint: 643F C2AF EB78 F886 40C9  B2A2 4AE2 C887 665E 0760

http://www.wso2.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://wso2.org/pipermail/wsas-java-dev/attachments/20070306/4d105b59/signature.pgp