[Registry-dev] One Registry per JVM

[Paul Fremantle]

+1. The whole aim of the embeddable API is dependent on this working
as a library.

Paul

On 3/14/08, Glen Daniels <glen at wso2.com> wrote:
> Hi folks:
>
> It looks like we currently have a notion that there should be only one
> Registry instance per JVM.  This seems completely unnecessary to me.
> Is there any good reason for it?
>
> Let's get rid of this restriction, and stop using System properties to
> store things.  That's a brittle and issue-prone pattern.
>
> Can we arrange a chat / call soon to discuss the lifecycle and
> configuration of registry servers?  I'd like to get this ironed out.
>
> Thanks,
> --Glen
>
> _______________________________________________
> Registry-dev mailing list
> Registry-dev at wso2.org
> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/registry-dev
>

-- 
Sent from Google Mail for mobile | mobile.google.com