[Registry-dev] [VOTE] Resource vs. Artifact

[Jonathan Marsh]

+1 for Resource.  Sounds so much fresher than a musty old Artifact ;-)

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: registry-dev-bounces at wso2.org [mailto:registry-dev-
> bounces at wso2.org] On Behalf Of deepal at wso2.com
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 9:38 AM
> To: registry-dev at wso2.org
> Subject: Re: [Registry-dev] [VOTE] Resource vs. Artifact
> 
> +1 for Resource.
> 
> Thanks
> Deepal
> 
> 
> > +1 for Resource
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ruwan
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Glen Daniels" <glen at wso2.com>
> > To: <registry-dev at wso2.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 3:45 PM
> > Subject: [Registry-dev] [VOTE] Resource vs. Artifact
> >
> >
> >> Hi folks!
> >>
> >> Since the comments have died down (and there weren't very many) on
> the
> >> other thread, let's VOTE to officially finish out this decision.
> >>
> >> Q: Should we name our "things" Resource or Artifact?
> >>
> >> Here's my +1 for Resource.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> --Glen
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Registry-dev mailing list
> >> Registry-dev at wso2.org
> >> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/registry-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Registry-dev mailing list
> > Registry-dev at wso2.org
> > http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/registry-dev
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Registry-dev mailing list
> Registry-dev at wso2.org
> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/registry-dev