[Registry-dev] Feedback please

[Chathura C. Ekanayake]

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> Chathura C. Ekanayake wrote:
>>> The UI needs major improvements but that's fine. We need to get user 
>>> manager integration done ASAP .. with the user manager built-in user 
>>> table.
>>
>> Are we going to do this for 0.1? According to Paul's road map, user 
>> manager integration is to be done in the 0.3 release.
>
> Now that the UM has shipped, I think we should bring it up a bit. What 
> else did we have on 0.2? Can we re-order priorities a bit?

Paul's plan is to make the 0.1 an internal release. Then ship 0.2 with 
the same set of features as an external release.
I will try to integrate UM for 0.2.

>
>> Still we don't have a wiki for the registry. I didn't ask infra team 
>> to create it as we have not finalized on the brand name. But I think 
>> we have to create it now, as we also need a jira. Shall we go with 
>> the brand name "WSO2 Registry"?
>
> Shall we stick to "WSO2 Social Registry"? I really want to keep some 
> relation to the fact that what we're doing has a community angle to it 
> .. which is a major distinguishing feature.

+1. Shall I ask infra team to create a wiki and jira with this name?

>
>> Problem in doing this is the lack of stable extensible search API. 
>> Although I have implemented this search API using RawSets as 
>> discussed earlier, there is an on going discussion to change this. 
>> Mashup site depends heavily on this. So I think it is better to 
>> finalize the API before implementing the mashup site.
>
> True. Can we focus on that in the next few days and get it sorted out?

+1

Thanks,
Chathura

>
> Sanjiva.