[Registry-dev] 1.0 features

[Sanjiva Weerawarana]

BTW- a "?" in front of a feature means we felt that doesn't need to be 
there for 1.0.

Sanjiva.

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> During a dinner in Mountain View more than a week ago, Glen, Deepal, 
> Chathura, Prasad and I came up with the following list as what we want 
> for 1.0. I had made all kinds of promises about Wiki-izing the words, 
> writing paragraphs etc. but of course did none of it :(. I've been 
> walking around with the paper we tore off the table cover for the last 
> 10+ days! I'm going to type it in now without waiting for further 
> embellishment!
> 
> - UI
> - REST API
> - Remote Java client
> - Remote Javascript client
> - Remote PHP client
> - Remote Ruby client
> - "Store absolutely URIs"
> - Media type awareness
>     - built in logic for WSDL, XSD
> - "Sub repository" concept
>     - built in logic for axis2 and synapse repos
> - resource and directory versioning
> - tags / comments / ratings
> - authorization and authentication
> ? - import from file system
> ? - export to file system
> ? - hierarchical registries
> ? - direct file system binding of Registry interface
> - events
> - audit log
> ? - dependency watchdogs
> ? - ability to front existing SVN repo with registry to give community 
> features to it
> ? - workflow integration
> - lifecycle support
> ? - hierarchical comments
> - ETags support
> 
> - documents
> - test suite
> - samples
> - clean code: NO IDE warnings, proper formatting etc.
> 
> Sanjiva.

-- 
Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/
email: sanjiva at wso2.com; cell: +1 650 265 8311 | +94 77 787 6880

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform."