[Registry-dev] Persistence registry - Implementation options

[Sanjiva Weerawarana]

I'm -1 on Hibernate. Let's just do SQL + JDBC .. that'll make it easier to 
do a good search API too.

We should be storing fairly simple structured info in the database tables- 
I really don't see a need to use an ORM tool.

Sanjiva.

Chathura C. Ekanayake wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have implemented the persistence registry for the previous requirements
> (i.e. with version control, links, etc.) using hibernate. But as we are 
> going to
> cut down most of those features in 0.1 release, I have to rewrite some 
> of the
> code. So it is easier if we finalize on the database implementation at this
> stage.
> 
> We are having following options:
> 
> Hibernate
> Plain SQL + JDBC
> Apache iBATIS
> 
> As I have already implemented it using hibernate, it is easier to modify
> it to the new requirements, if we continue to use hibernate.
> 
> Comments...
> 
> Thanks,
> Chathura
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Registry-dev mailing list
> Registry-dev at wso2.org
> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/registry-dev
> 

-- 
Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/
email: sanjiva at wso2.com; cell: +94 77 787 6880; fax: +1 509 691 2000

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform."